A recent analysis examines policies that, under the guise of defending national and Islamic values, have effectively led to the disempowerment and dependency of the Afghan people. The commentary argues that depriving people of education, weakening independent thought, and dismantling national institutions have been key actions in this project.
The author questions why actions that undermine Afghanistan's independence, progress, and national foundations are often justified with religious and patriotic slogans. According to the analysis, proponents of this ideology try to give their policies a national and Islamic color, promoting the idea that without their "struggles," Afghans would have lost their identity.
The piece points to an ironic example: the claim that the wars against the Soviets and NATO were necessary to prevent Afghan names from being changed to "Alexander" or having suffixes like "-ov" added. The author sarcastically notes that while Afghan names remained unchanged, the Taliban themselves renamed Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to "Mullah Rov."
This seemingly humorous example, the author argues, exposes the weakness of the logic used by those who fear foreign cultural influence while engaging in contradictory actions themselves. It suggests a focus on superficial symbols over substantive issues.
The analysis concludes that the real threat to Afghanistan's national and religious identity is not changing names but rather ignorance, poverty, and economic dependency. The true defense of Afghan dignity and identity, it argues, lies in education, economic independence, strong national institutions, and a system that respects human rights and dignity. The author states that a nation's greatest defeat is not being fought against by outsiders, but having the ability to build its own future taken away.
Source: Zarin TV Analysis
🌐
