For years, every time a new leader comes, we become hopeful. After a few years, we become disappointed again and start looking for someone else.
Maybe it is time to ask ourselves an honest question: Is the real problem our leaders, or is it the lack of law?
For years, we have given more importance to individuals than to the law. When a leader we like makes a mistake, we are often unwilling to criticize him. But when his opponent does the same thing, we strongly object.
Afghanistan needs law, justice, equal rights for all citizens, freedom of speech, and strong institutions. We need institutions that do not disappear when one leader leaves and have to be rebuilt when another leader comes.
Security is important, but security should not become an excuse to silence the people. Disagreement is natural, but an opponent is not an enemy.
One question we often hear from people is: If the Taliban leave, who can replace them?
Years ago, people asked the same question about Ashraf Ghani.
Today, they ask the same question about the Taliban. But maybe this is not the main question. Maybe instead of asking “Who?” we should ask, “What kind of law?”
What matters is not only who comes to power. What matters is whether there is a fair law and independent institutions.
Successful countries did not become successful because they always had the best leaders. They became successful because they built systems that continue to function even when their leaders change.
So maybe it is time that instead of asking, “If this leader leaves, who will replace him?” we ask ourselves:
“What kind of law do we need so that no matter who comes to power, they cannot ignore the rights of the people?”
If we can answer this question, changing leaders will no longer be our biggest concern.
Then the real power will be in the hands of the law, not individuals.
Noor Wodjouatt
