Fazl Mahmoud Fazli, the former Director General of the Administrative Office of the President of Afghanistan, has challenged the notion of true media independence during the republic era. He argues that media independence is not merely freedom from government censorship, but is fundamentally tied to financial and political dependence on foreign donors.
In a recent analysis, Mr. Fazli asserted that while many prominent Afghan media outlets appeared free from government control, their financial survival was entirely dependent on foreign aid. He stressed that "freedom from the government" and "independence from a donor" are two distinct concepts, and when a media outlet's existence relies on external funding, its political and editorial independence is seriously compromised.
To support his argument, Fazli cited the November 2019 prisoner exchange involving Anas Haqqani, Haji Mali Khan, and Hafiz Rashid. He claimed that following the decision, and despite the Afghan government's serious concerns, the American side directly contacted major private television and radio networks to manage the media coverage of the sensitive event.
The result, according to Fazli, was that the media refrained from harsh and critical discussions about a decision the Afghan government opposed. He presents this as clear evidence of donor influence shaping media narratives.
The former top official extends this logic to non-governmental organizations, civil society activists, and political institutions. In his view, the ultimate measure of true independence for any media outlet or political movement is possessing the right and courage to critically assess the policies and priorities of its foreign donors and allies, not just its own government.
Fazli's commentary raises important questions about the nature of international aid to Afghan media and its impact on their impartiality and autonomy over the past two decades.
Source: Fazl Mahmoud Fazli's writings
🌐
